Post the comment that got you banned from /r/bitcoin
I thought this might be a fun catch all. I'm happy to have been banned since I always backslid and replied to comments there based on there being a lot of content there which I always felt guilty about. Its very bad for bitcoin that /bitcoin is ran the way it is. Anyway I was permanently banned for this comment below, how about you? https://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/3uw5tp/slush_pool_to_reenable_bip_101_bitcoin_mining/cxizaca "This is the largest bitcoin forum and it needs to be called out for the damage it does every day to bitcoin. The only thing worth posting in this subreddit anymore is complaints about how terrible it is and instructions to go elsewhere. Youre right that a serious discussion is no longer possible here." The ironic thing is this had some upvotes and I didn't think it was that inflammatory maybe if I made this today I wouldnt have been banned since now even the score of posts is censored.
05-07 06:31 - 'That's ridiculous u/gavinandresen has incited anger and hatred against the Core devs and has personally flamed many Core developers, in an unprofessional and discourteous manner. He's refused to listen and accused Core developer...' by /u/pb1x removed from /r/Bitcoin within 265-270min
Amanda from The Daily Decrypt here. I'm looking to do a video special on what's going on with BIP 101, BitcoinXT/Bitcoin Unlimited, and potential hard forks. Answers to my questions here would help tremendously. Thanks for your time.
1 - Does Bitcoin Unlimited support BIP 101 natively, or can it be made to do so? 2 - If a Bitcoin Unlimited node sets their max accepted block size to 8MB or above, does that mean they are automatically "supporting" BIP 101? 3 - It looks like XT+BU nodes currently make up almost 13% of the network. Does anything like a fork happen at a certain threshold? If so, what is that percentage? 4 - What does a fork look like, in short? 5 - The block size has been just one contentious issue in Bitcoin. There are certainly more to come. Do you foresee that competing reference clients will be how problems are again solved in the future, a.k.a. vote by node? 6 - Which mining pools have made the switch to either XT or BU already? 7 - What decides what the "main chain" is in Bitcoin -- "hashing power" or node majority? Please explain. Thanks so much! -Amanda @TheDailyDecrypt
It has taken me a long time, but I finally committed ALL of my resources to BIP 101 - bitcoin xt
I run two full nodes and a small miner. I switched on full node to xt when all of this started, but now I'm fed up. I switched my miner back to slush's pool today and I updated my other node to bitcoinxt. Sometimes it just feels refreshing to do the right thing. If you want to move your miners to slush's pool and show your support for 8mb blocks (aka: bitcoinxt, BIP 101), set up an account at http://mining.bitcoin.cz and use these mining addresses: stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3301 - General stratum+tcp://us-east.stratum.bitcoin.cz:3301 - USA stratum+tcp://eu.stratum.bitcoin.cz:3301 - Europe Slush is re-enabling BIPB101:https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/slush-pool-to-re-enable-bip-bitcoin-mining-1448902761 If you want to set up bitcoixt, it's pretty easy to just remove bitcoind and run the binary linked here: https://bitcoinxt.software/ You can find more information about bitcoinxt blocks here: http://xtnodes.com/
Stephen Pair, CEO of Bitpay, on BIP 101, node decentralisation and bitcoin as a settlement layer
Now my question: What are you doing to help mold consensus around BIP101 (or if not that, some other block size solution)? Are you flying out to meet with miners? Are you calling up other people in the ecosystem? If you have been doing this, how have those conversations been going? What sort of counterarguments are you getting?
We've been talking to other companies, miners and core developers about it. I also went to the Scaling Bitcoin conference in Montreal (which I thought was one of the best Bitcoin conferences I'd ever attended). We had hoped that a consensus would be reached among core developers and we would follow that consensus, but it got to a point where we thought we needed to make our views known. The counter arguments are generally along the lines that if you increase the resource requirements on a node, less people will run nodes and bitcoin will become centralized. People also state that bitcoin can/should be used as a settlement layer. We of course agree that bitcoin must remain decentralized. While an increase in resource requirements for a node will discourage more nodes, an increase in throughput will accommodate more adoption, which will encourage more nodes. The economic decision to run a full node has to do with how much you value the ability to independently and trustlessly validate transactions. That ability is worth a lot if you assume Bitcoin enjoys widespread adoption. In addition, there is a lot of room for optimization that would reduce the resource utilization of a node. Regarding the settlement layer arguments, I don't think Bitcoin is compelling as a settlement layer unless it enjoys widespread adoption as a payment network. Bitcoin's utility as a payment system is its intrinsic value. If it's not useful for that purpose, it doesn't really have any value. If it doesn't have any value, it has no value as a settlement system. To put it in other words, if it cannot be practically used to pay people for things, then why would you have any interest in using it for settlement?
/u/theymos: -249 points from last 1000 comments. Worst Comment (-752 points): "Right. If Coinbase promotes XT to customers on coinbase.com and/or switches all of its full nodes to BIP 101 software, then Coinbase is no longer using the Bitcoin currency, and it doesn't belong on /r/Bitcoin."
Skip to content. KNC $1.00 () TUSD $1.00 () BIP number allocated 41 API/RPC Stratum mining protocol Marek Palatinus Standard BIP number allocated 42: Consensus (soft fork) A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin Pieter Wuille Standard Final 43: Applications Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets Marek Palatinus, Pavol Rusnak Informational Final 44: Applications BIP 101 ist alles andere als sicher. Aber selbst wenn sich die Fork harmonisch zugunsten von BIP 101 (also XT) ausspielen sollte, ist die Situation nicht entschärft. Denn von allen Vorschlägen zur Erhöhung der Blockgröße ist BIP 101 der radikalste und darum auch gefährlichste. BIP 101 sieht vor, die Blockgröße sofort auf 8 MB und ... Bitcoin XT steht für BIP 101. BIP ist eine Abkürzung und bedeutet „Bitcoin Improvement Proposal“ was zu Deutsch etwa mit „Bitcoin Verbesserungsvorschlag “übersetzt werden kann. Angedacht ist es die Blocksize auf 8 MB anzuheben. Des Weiteren soll alle 63.072.000 Sekunden die Blocksize verdoppelt werden. Das entspricht pro Verdoppelung der Blocksize einen Zeithorizont von etwa 2 ... A Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) is a design document for introducing features or information to Bitcoin.This is the standard way of communicating ideas since Bitcoin has no formal structure. The first BIP was submitted by Amir Taaki on 2011-08-19 and described what a BIP is.
BITCOIN XT meaning - BITCOIN XT definition - BITCOIN XT explanation. ... Skip navigation Sign in. Search. Loading... Close. This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue. Watch Queue ... Know how to create a Bitcoin paper wallet. This video will help you create a secure BIP 38 Encrypted Bitcoin paper wallet. A step-by-step guide on how to mak... Bitcoin 101 - Intro to Paper Wallets & Cold Storage ... How To Make A Secure BIP 38 Encrypted Bitcoin Paper Wallet - TUTORIAL - Duration: 13:38. MrJayBusch 116,556 views. 13:38. How The Economic ... petit délire de Guides. Uncensor the World: Michael W. Dean & Derrick Slopey Talk BipCoin, Dot-Bip, More - YMB Podcast E152 - Duration: 48:37. World Crypto Network 230 views Bitcoin wallets 101 99Bitcoins. Loading... Unsubscribe from 99Bitcoins? ... How To Make A Secure BIP 38 Encrypted Bitcoin Paper Wallet - TUTORIAL - Duration: 13:38. MrJayBusch 117,543 views. 13:38 ...